Meeting Notification

Notice...

We are having weekly informal meetings in Room 304 every Friday at lunch. We'll be listening to talk radio shows, talking about the presidential race, or watching Rush on the Dittocam.

Be sure to answer the poll question at left... it'll let me know just how many people visit the site. And join the Facebook group too while you're at it.

-Aaron



Come and Take It

Come and Take It

Mar 7, 2008

Posts on Victory Briefs Daily

As I searched Google for my name, I found these gems (you can go to the link to see the names of the guy that posted this)...
By the way, I recommend Michael Savage’s SAVAGE NATION. He covers a variety of topics, all of his positions laughable. A good read.

Also, I’m sure Patrick would like to recognize Aaron Cichon, a student at Strake Jesuit who wrote a very racist case for the pofo topic last year in Mr. Crist’s freshman speech class. It was he who gave us the ideas for the ironic part of the AC.

Some of the cards we used/were considering:

Michael Savage: “Man, this is what we’re fighting for. We’re working to preserve the freedom that enables a family to play and love each other without fear of being harmed. Which is why we must do everything in our power - including racial profiling as needed - to snuff out those who are here, right now, waiting to snuff out the American dream.”

“This will shock you, but it’s a fact: 25 to 30 percent of all prisoners in our jails today are illegal immigrants. You better read that again. Do you understand what that means to your paycheck? Americans are being taxed to fund the cost of housing, feeding, entertaining, and guarding one in the four prisoners who don’t even belong in this country! That’s insanity”

“There’s a third class who come to America. These dirty thieves come here not to mooch, not for the ACLU-care benefits, not to study, not for the host of other liberal handouts. They come to kill us. They come to poison your daughter’s lunch box. They come to fly planes into buildings. These snakes pretend to be one of us. They might blend in as they await their orders to stab America in the back.”

Pat Buchanan: “Who can guarantee that, of the untold millions of illegals here, and the scores of thousands ordered deported for crimes who have disappeared into our midst, none is a terrorist waiting for orders to blow up a subway or mall and massacre American citizens? Most of these illegals come to work to send money back to their families. They are not bad people. But because they are predominantly young and male, they commit a disproportionate share of violent crimes. Why should U.S. citizens be assaulted, robbed, raped and murdered, and have their children molested, because their government will not enforce its own laws? Is this not an indictment of democracy itself? What dictatorial regime would put up with this?” Buchanan also attacks various ethnic groups in the US (”hyphenated Americanism”) — including Jews, Blacks, Hispanics, Greeks, and Armenians — for exerting too much political influence and weakening the foundation of the United States’ traditional Anglo-Saxon culture.

Irony solves.

Here is a reply from an anonymous poster named John:

This is a response to the post by Brian Kwik (#63):

So, everyone who is a conservative is supposed to agree with other conservatives who are in “professional politics” (meaning that they are nationally recognized)? Not everyone in America is a “Bush-bot” like Rush Limbaugh or Sean Hannity. Here is what Buchanan has posted on his website, theamericancause.org:

“Since he [President Bush] took office in 2001, Bush said in Tucson, Ariz., U.S. border agents have apprehended and sent home 4.5 million illegal aliens, ‘including more than 350,000 with criminal records.’”

What is so ironic about the Michael Savage and Pat Buchanan quotes? They have the same positions on abortion, affirmative action, foreign aid, gun rights, immigration, and taxes - all of the biggest issues that really matter.

One last thing: any sensible human being should know that ALL of the positions described in Michael Savage’s book THE SAVAGE NATION are not laughable, as you say, Brian Kwik. Certainly, if you disagree with Savage about something, you may find it funny that he says it. But the pro-life stance he takes is “laughable?” How about anti-terrorism - is that funny, too? What about his standing up for the tradionial family: were you rolling on the floor, trying to keep your sides splitting from the humor?

If they are, then I would like to know what turkey baster you were born in. Your opinions were most likely taken from your parents - as they raised you, correct? or am I incorrect in that assumption, too? - and no child could possibly withstand the tools an abortionist uses to rip an unwanted child to pieces.

So now, this is where the mental disorder of liberalism comes to expose its ugly head; the response to the anonymous post:

I’m gonna respond to this cause it’s funny.

“What is so ironic about the Michael Savage and Pat Buchanan quotes? They have the same positions on abortion, affirmative action, foreign aid, gun rights, immigration, and taxes - all of the biggest issues that really matter.”

Yeah, and their positions are laughable.

“One last thing: any sensible human being should know that ALL of the positions described in Michael Savage’s book THE SAVAGE NATION are not laughable, as you say, Brian Kwik. ”

They are if you’re educated.

“But the pro-life stance he takes is “laughable?””

Yeah, it’s laughable. It’s also archaic, but laughable is part of it.

“How about anti-terrorism - is that funny, too? ”

To essentialize it like that? Yeah, it’s funny. Us against the terrorists, right? Yes, the position is absolutely laughable.

” What about his standing up for the tradionial family: were you rolling on the floor, trying to keep your sides splitting from the humor?”

Yup. Between getting irritated by the reactionary homophobia that is vital to the “traditional family” position. It would be hilarious if it weren’t so offensive and stupid.

” and no child could possibly withstand the tools an abortionist uses to rip an unwanted child to pieces.”

Fallacy. Appeal to emotion. In all honesty, if someone doesn’t want their baby, they should probably have it aborted. Not three weeks before it’s due, but within a reasonable time frame.

And yeah, your positions are pretty laughable, too.

That's the cost of being a conservative in modern America. Ain't that sweet.

-Aaron

Feb 7, 2008

John McCain - A Fraud

As you now know, John McCain is the leading Republican candidate so far for the 2008 Presidential election. All the other major-leaguers have bowed out because they couldn't win, or because they just ran out of money (Fred Thompson, Rudy, and today, Mitt Romney).

This leaves us with three very exciting possibilities...
  • a Congressman from Brazoria county who says mall security does a better at securing America than the Marines (Dr. Ron Paul, OB/GYN)
  • a Joel Olsteen-like preacher who thinks he's funny, but really not (Mike Huck-a-schmuck)
  • and the "Clinton of the Right," John McCain the war hero.
You will hear a lot about McCain's war record. That is because he wants to remove the focus from his terrible domestic policy record, and focus us on just his heroism from many years ago.

Let me tell you though, McCain's heroism in Vietnam was much more real than John Kerry's ever was.

But McCain's record is one of secrets and deceit - a record of fraudulent and adulterous Republicanism.

Here is his trail of tears:
  • Gang of 14
    • He stopped conservatives in Congress from preventing unconstitutional Democrat filibusters of true conservative Supreme Court nominees. All SC nominees deserve an up-or-down (yes-or-no) vote, but McCain the Liberal led the fight on the other side of the aisle - with the Democrats.
  • McCain/Feingold
    • This is campaign finance reform, which allows only the rich to run for President and other high office. This leads to the destruction of our First Amendment, as this completely prevents the "little people" from purchasing ad time on television (the easiest way to reach lots of people at the same time) to inform others about candidates.
  • Drilling in ANWR
    • McCain compares ANWAR to the Everglades and the Grand Canyon.
  • John Kerry's Vice-President
  • McCain/Kennedy amnesty
    • Do you like illegal immigration? John McCain does! McCain wrote amnesty legislation in the summer of 2007 with Ted Kennedy to grant amnesty for 12-30 million illegal immigrants in America. If we disagreed, we were racists or bigots.
  • Rights for terrorists
    • "Supports giving lawyers and American rights to foreign terrorists, bringing them to our homeland, then setting them free to roam about with zero interrogation. No understanding of the War on Terror, this being his evidence of it."
  • Lies
    • "Frequently lies about his record including smearing Romney for something he didn't say, ie. "timetables". An action condemned by nearly every conservative and media op in the country."
  • Anti-Tax Cuts
    • "Voted against the Bush Tax Cuts before he voted to make them permanent. The latter being only so he could attempt to run for President as a 'Republican'."
  • Anti-Capitalism
    • "Constantly speaking out against big business including all the jobs Romney created in the private sector. All for the sake of a cheap shot in a debate on TV."
  • Anti-Conservative judges
    • "Mentioned specifically that he would not have nominated Sam Alito to the SCOTUS. Unforgivable."
The structure of this post was borrowed from a post by "Cary" on PatGray.com
http://www.patgray.com/content/view/1143/21/

Now, the most attentive reader will recognize that I did not mention McCain on pro-life issues. He is abysmal on that as well. This is from Ann Coulter's most recent column:

"Although McCain has the minimum pro-life record demanded by the voters of Arizona, in 2006, McCain voted in favor of using taxpayer funds to harvest stem cells from human embryos. He opposes a constitutional amendment to protect human life. And he frets that if Roe v. Wade were overruled, women's lives would be "endangered." This is the same John McCain who chides Mitt Romney today for "flip-flopping" on abortion. At least Romney flips and stays there.

Of course the most important issue for pro-lifers is the Supreme Court. As long as Roe v. Wade is the law of the land, it doesn't matter how many hearts and minds we've changed. So it's not insignificant that McCain has called Justice Samuel Alito too conservative."


Now can you finally understand the conservative outrage amongst the party faithful? McCain talks a good game of "uniting the party," but he is the one DIVIDING us. It's him and his liberal foolishness that will cause us to loose the next election - lest we find a true conservative in the next nine months.

-Aaron

(sickening, by the way)



Nov 15, 2007

Proton May Develop "Islamic Car"

UALA LUMPUR, Malaysia — So what constitutes an "Islamic car"? A vehicle with a compartment to store a Qu'ran and prayer scarf, as well as a built-in compass that points the way to Mecca.

Described as an Iranian initiative, the concept is under consideration by Malaysia's state-owned Proton, which just won an order to supply Tehran's taxi fleet with 5,000 Waja compacts.

A Proton executive, in Iran to secure the deal, described his company's dream of an "Islamic car" that could be produced in Malaysia, Iran or Turkey and sold in various global markets, including countries with large Muslim populations such as Indonesia and Pakistan. Such a car, he added, "will have all the Islamic features," including the aforementioned way-to-Mecca compass and storage for the Muslim holy book.

What this means to you: Niche marketing and culturally sensitive marketing join together in this unusual display.

From Edmunds.com

Nov 8, 2007

Hillary and Taxes

Hitler Speaks at Columbia


Speech by President Sarkozy Before Congress

Read it; it's good.

-Aaron

---

Madam Speaker,
Mr. President,
Ladies and Gentlemen of the United States Congress,
Ladies and Gentlemen,

The state of our friendship and our alliance is strong.

Friendship, first and foremost, means being true to one's friends. Since the United States first appeared on the world scene, the loyalty between the French and American people has never failed. And far from being weakened by the vicissitudes of History, it has never ceased growing stronger.

Friends may have differences; they may have disagreements; they may have disputes.

But in times of difficulty, in times of hardship, friends stand together, side by side; they support each other; and help one another.

In times of difficulty, in times of hardship, America and France have always stood side by side, supported one another, helped one another, fought for each other's freedom.

The United States and France remain true to the memory of their common history, true to the blood spilled by their children in common battles. But they are not true merely to the memory of what they accomplished together in the past. They remain true, first and foremost, to the same ideal, the same principles, the same values that have always united them.

The deliberations of your Congress are conducted under the double gaze of Washington and Lafayette. Lafayette, whose 250th birthday we are celebrating this year and who was the first foreign dignitary, in 1824, to address a joint session of Congress. What was it that brought these two men—so far apart in age and background—together, if not their faith in common values, the heritage of the Enlightenment, the same love for freedom and justice?

Upon first meeting Washington, Lafayette told him: "I have come here to learn, not to teach." It was this new spirit and youth of the Old World seeking out the wisdom of the New World that opened a new era for all of humanity.

From the very beginning, the American dream meant putting into practice the dreams of the Old World.

From the very beginning, the American dream meant proving to all mankind that freedom, justice, human rights and democracy were no utopia but were rather the most realistic policy there is and the most likely to improve the fate of each and every person.

America did not tell the millions of men and women who came from every country in the world and who—with their hands, their intelligence and their heart—built the greatest nation in the world: "Come, and everything will be given to you." She said: "Come, and the only limits to what you'll be able to achieve will be your own courage and your own talent." America embodies this extraordinary ability to grant each and every person a second chance.

Here, both the humblest and most illustrious citizens alike know that nothing is owed to them and that everything has to be earned. That's what constitutes the moral value of America. America did not teach men the idea of freedom; she taught them how to practice it. And she fought for this freedom whenever she felt it to be threatened somewhere in the world. It was by watching America grow that men and women understood that freedom was possible.

What made America great was her ability to transform her own dream into hope for all mankind.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

The men and women of my generation heard their grandparents talk about how in 1917, America saved France at a time when it had reached the final limits of its strength, which it had exhausted in the most absurd and bloodiest of wars.

The men and women of my generation heard their parents talk about how in 1944, America returned to free Europe from the horrifying tyranny that threatened to enslave it.

Fathers took their sons to see the vast cemeteries where, under thousands of white crosses so far from home, thousands of young American soldiers lay who had fallen not to defend their own freedom but the freedom of all others, not to defend their own families, their own homeland, but to defend humanity as a whole.

Fathers took their sons to the beaches where the young men of America had so heroically landed. They read them the admirable letters of farewell that those 20-year-old soldiers had written to their families before the battle to tell them: "We don't consider ourselves heroes. We want this war to be over. But however much dread we may feel, you can count on us." Before they landed, Eisenhower told them: "The eyes of the world are upon you. The hopes and prayers of liberty-loving people everywhere march with you."

And as they listened to their fathers, watched movies, read history books and the letters of soldiers who died on the beaches of Normandy and Provence, as they visited the cemeteries where the star-spangled banner flies, the children of my generation understood that these young Americans, 20 years old, were true heroes to whom they owed the fact that they were free people and not slaves. France will never forget the sacrifice of your children.

To those 20-year-old heroes who gave us everything, to the families of those who never returned, to the children who mourned fathers they barely got a chance to know, I want to express France's eternal gratitude.

On behalf of my generation, which did not experience war but knows how much it owes to their courage and their sacrifice; on behalf of our children, who must never forget; to all the veterans who are here today and, notably the seven I had the honor to decorate yesterday evening, one of whom, Senator Inouye, belongs to your Congress, I want to express the deep, sincere gratitude of the French people. I want to tell you that whenever an American soldier falls somewhere in the world, I think of what the American army did for France. I think of them and I am sad, as one is sad to lose a member of one's family.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

The men and women of my generation remember the Marshall Plan that allowed their fathers to rebuild a devastated Europe. They remember the Cold War, during which America again stood as the bulwark of the Free World against the threat of new tyranny.

I remember the Berlin crisis and Kennedy who unhesitatingly risked engaging the United States in the most destructive of wars so that Europe could preserve the freedom for which the American people had already sacrificed so much. No one has the right to forget. Forgetting, for a person of my generation, would be tantamount to self-denial.

But my generation did not love America only because she had defended freedom. We also loved her because for us, she embodied what was most audacious about the human adventure; for us, she embodied the spirit of conquest. We loved America because for us, America was a new frontier that was continuously pushed back—a constantly renewed challenge to the inventiveness of the human spirit.

My generation shared all the American dreams. Our imaginations were fueled by the winning of the West and Hollywood. By Elvis Presley, Duke Ellington, Hemingway. By John Wayne, Charlton Heston, Marilyn Monroe, Rita Hayworth. And by Armstrong, Aldrin and Collins, fulfilling mankind's oldest dream.

What was so extraordinary for us was that through her literature, her cinema and her music, America always seemed to emerge from adversity even greater and stronger; that instead of causing America to doubt herself, such ordeals only strengthened her belief in her values.

What makes America strong is the strength of this ideal that is shared by all Americans and by all those who love her because they love freedom.

America's strength is not only a material strength, it is first and foremost a spiritual and moral strength. No one expressed this better than a black pastor who asked just one thing of America: that she be true to the ideal in whose name he—the grandson of a slave—felt so deeply American. His name was Martin Luther King. He made America a universal role model.

The world still remembers his words—words of love, dignity and justice. America heard those words and America changed. And the men and women who had doubted America because they no longer recognized her began loving her again.

Fundamentally, what are those who love America asking of her, if not to remain forever true to her founding values?

Ladies and Gentlemen,

Today as in the past, as we stand at the beginning of the 21st century, it is together that we must fight to defend and promote the values and ideals of freedom and democracy that men such as Washington and Lafayette invented together.

Together we must fight against terrorism. On September 11, 2001, all of France—petrified with horror—rallied to the side of the American people. The front-page headline of one of our major dailies read: "We are all American." And on that day, when you were mourning for so many dead, never had America appeared to us as so great, so dignified, so strong. The terrorists had thought they would weaken you. They made you greater. The entire world felt admiration for the courage of the American people. And from day one, France decided to participate shoulder to shoulder with you in the war in Afghanistan. Let me tell you solemnly today: France will remain engaged in Afghanistan as long as it takes, because what's at stake in that country is the future of our values and that of the Atlantic Alliance. For me, failure is not an option. Terrorism will not win because democracies are not weak, because we are not afraid of this barbarism. America can count on France.

Together we must fight against proliferation. Success in Libya and progress under way in North Korea shows that nuclear proliferation is not inevitable. Let me say it here before all of you: The prospect of an Iran armed with nuclear weapons is unacceptable. The Iranian people is a great people. It deserves better than the increased sanctions and growing isolation to which its leaders condemn it. Iran must be convinced to choose cooperation, dialogue and openness. No one must doubt our determination.

Together we must help the people of the Middle East find the path of peace and security. To the Israeli and Palestinian leaders I say this: Don't hesitate! Risk peace! And do it now! The status quo hides even greater dangers: that of delivering Palestinian society as a whole to the extremists that contest Israel's existence; that of playing into the hands of radical regimes that are exploiting the deadlock in the conflict to destabilize the region; that of fueling the propaganda of terrorists who want to set Islam against the West. France wants security for Israel and a State for the Palestinians.

Together we must help the Lebanese people affirm their independence, their sovereignty, their freedom, their democracy. What Lebanon needs today is a broad-based president elected according to the established schedule and in strict respect of the Constitution. France stands engaged alongside all the Lebanese. It will not accept attempts to subjugate the Lebanese people.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

America feels it has the vocation to inspire the world. Because she is the most powerful country in the world. Because, for more than two centuries, she has striven to uphold the ideals of democracy and freedom. But this stated responsibility comes with duties, the first of which is setting an example.

Those who love this nation which, more than any other, has demonstrated the virtues of free enterprise expect America to be the first to denounce the abuses and excesses of a financial capitalism that sets too great a store on speculation. They expect her to commit fully to the establishment of the necessary rules and safeguards. The America I love is the one that encourages entrepreneurs, not speculators.

Those who admire the nation that has built the world's greatest economy and has never ceased trying to persuade the world of the advantages of free trade expect her to be the first to promote fair exchange rates. The yuan is already everyone's problem. The dollar cannot remain solely the problem of others. If we're not careful, monetary disarray could morph into economic war. We would all be its victims.

Those who love the country of wide open spaces, national parks and nature reserves expect America to stand alongside Europe in leading the fight against global warming that threatens the destruction of our planet. I know that each day, in their cities and states, the American people are more aware of the stakes and determined to act. This essential fight for the future of humanity must be all of America's fight.

Those who have not forgotten that it was the United States that, at the end of the Second World War, raised hopes for a new world order are asking America to take the lead in the necessary reforms of the UN, the IMF, the World Bank and the G8. Our globalized world must be organized for the 21st century, not for the last century. The emerging countries we need for global equilibrium must be given their rightful place.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

Allow me to express one last conviction: Trust Europe.

In this unstable, dangerous world, the United States of America needs a strong, determined Europe. With the simplified treaty I proposed to our partners, the European Union is about to emerge from 10 years of discussions on its institutions and 10 years of paralysis. Soon it will have a stable president and a more powerful High Representative for foreign and security policy, and it must now reactivate the construction of its military capacities.

The ambition I am proposing to our partners is based on a simple observation: There are more crises than there are capacities to face them. NATO cannot be everywhere. The EU must be able to act, as it did in the Balkans and in the Congo, and as it will tomorrow on the border of Sudan and Chad. For that the Europeans must step up their efforts.

My approach is purely pragmatic. Having learned from history, I want the Europeans, in the years to come, to have the means to shoulder a growing share of their defense. Who could blame the United States for ensuring its own security? No one. Who could blame me for wanting Europe to ensure more of its own security? No one. All of our Allies, beginning with the United States, with whom we most often share the same interests and the same adversaries, have a strategic interest in a Europe that can assert itself as a strong, credible security partner.

At the same time, I want to affirm my attachment to NATO. I say it here before this Congress: The more successful we are in the establishment of a European Defense, the more France will be resolved to resume its full role in NATO.

I would like France, a founding member of our Alliance and already one of its largest contributors, to assume its full role in the effort to renew NATO's instruments and means of action and, in this context, to allow its relations with the Alliance to evolve.

This is no time for theological quarrels but for pragmatic responses to make our security tools more effective and operational in the face of crises. The EU and NATO must march hand in hand.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

I want to be your friend, your ally and your partner. But a friend who stands on his own two feet. An independent ally. A free partner.

France must be stronger. I am determined to carry through with the reforms that my country has put off for all too long. I will not turn back, because France has turned back for all too long. My country has enormous assets. While respecting its unique identity, I want to put it into a position to win all the battles of globalization. I passionately love France. I am lucid about the work that remains to be accomplished.

It is this ambitious France that I have come to present to you today. A France that comes out to meet America to renew the pact of friendship and the alliance that Washington and Lafayette sealed in Yorktown.

Together let us be worthy of their example, let us be equal to their ambition, let us be true to their memories!

Long live the United States of America!

Vive la France!

Long live French-American friendship!

Oct 29, 2007

Don't You Just Love Big Government?

Thomas Paine said it best: "the government that governs least governs best." I guess I have always been correct to assume that people are, on average, dumber than a warm bucket of hair. Read this and weep...
-Aaron
---
State report says Texas has too many reports

AUSTIN (chron.com, from AP)— The Texas State Library and Archives Commission is declaring there are too many state reports.

It says so in a 668-page report.

The project took 18 months and included the commission's small team canvassing more than 170 agencies, and public colleges and universities, checking on all the reports they are assigned to do.

In the past, the state regularly compiled a list of about 400 reports that agencies were required by the Legislature to produce. But the commission found more than 1,600, and state records administrator Michael Heskett is pretty sure his team hasn't found them all.

Heskett's initial findings indicate more than 400 report requirements are obsolete, duplicative or not needed as frequently as currently required.

"At first, we were overwhelmed by the sheer number of reporting requirements," Heskett said. "We haven't begun our evaluation yet. But I think we can reach our goal of eliminating the deadwood without compromising the need for accountability in our state agencies."

Agencies stand to save thousands of staff hours and tons of paper, although the commission hasn't estimated yet exactly how much of either, Heskett said.

In a typical legislative session, lawmakers call for about a dozen new reports to meet the requirements for a new law. Another 20 or so reports are attached to appropriations bills as a way of making sure allocated money is properly spent.

Unless these reports are repealed by the Legislature, agencies are required to prepare them, even if the need for the report — or the agency — no longer exists.

One of the obsolete reports is the Funds Received and Disbursed report. One of the oldest required reports, it is still dutifully done, though there's a report under the Uniform Statewide Accounting Act that requires much the same data, Heskett said.

Report 1473 calls upon the Department of Aging to prepare a report, although the Department of Aging no longer exists.

There are still report requirements for the Human Rights Commission, which the Legislature abolished in 2003, Heskett said.

The Texas Workforce Commission is required annually to report on creating equal opportunity guidelines for employees that have been in place for years and are in no need of re-creating.

Heskett's team found was a huge backlog of reporting requirements, the volume of which has increased in the past 20 years with added emphasis on transparency and open records in state government.

The Library and Archives Commission has only just begun assessing the report requirements one by one, which Heskett expects will take at least another year.

The Library and Archives Commission runs the state's publications depository system, which warehouses untold tons of paper reports and keeps an electronic records and information locator to search and sort that data.

As for the commission's massive report on reports, Heskett predicts it won't go away.

"For the report to be effective, it must be ongoing," he said.