Meeting Notification

Notice...

We are having weekly informal meetings in Room 304 every Friday at lunch. We'll be listening to talk radio shows, talking about the presidential race, or watching Rush on the Dittocam.

Be sure to answer the poll question at left... it'll let me know just how many people visit the site. And join the Facebook group too while you're at it.

-Aaron



Come and Take It

Come and Take It

Apr 25, 2008

The Real Che Was No T-Shirt Idol, As Cuban-American Author Finds

By INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY
Posted Tuesday, July 10, 2007 4:20 PM PT

Cuba's late Marxist revolutionary, Ernesto "Che" Guevara, is experiencing something of a revival these days. His fiery-eyed visage and rock-star good looks, immortalized in an iconic snapshot by photographer Alfredo Korda in 1961, seem to epitomize the youthful idealism of revolution, rebellion and free-spiritedness.

Since then, the famous communist's face has shown up on T-shirts, car decals, wristwatches, baby clothes, CD cases, hubcaps, jewelry, backpacks, and in Manhattan classroom posters, ironically advertising value of his image to capitalist markets.

Hillary Clinton has been spotted at campaign rallies with Che T-shirt wearers. Carlos Santana has paraded his shirt at award shows. Angelina Jolie reportedly sports a Che tattoo. And Hollywood has idealized the Argentine-born revolutionary in glossy movies like "The Motorcycle Diaries."

The only problem with this romance is there's not a wisp of truth to it. Guevara was a deadly "killing machine" whose legacy was to enslave and impoverish Cuba.

Cuban-American author Humberto Fontova researched the man behind the image, exploring why pop culture seems so enamored of Che Guevara. Speaking to dozens of Cubans who knew and fought with Guevara (1928-1967), Fontova pieced together a very different picture of Guevara for his book, "Exposing The Real Che Guevara and the Useful Idiots Who Idolize Him."
We spoke with Fontova about the real Che, one of history's most undeservedly idolized mass murderers.

IBD: You spent some of your childhood in the first years of the Cuban revolution before your family managed to escape in 1961. How did your family manage to get out?
Fontova: Filmmaker Michael Moore said that the reason Cubans live so well in the U.S. is that they brought all their loot from Havana. But almost all Cubans came to the U.S. with only the clothes on their backs.

We managed to get out by plane, not raft, or inner tube in 1961. The totalitarian bureaucracy allowed some people to get out legally, but it took a year to get the paperwork done, and as we got to the airport, Cuban troops yanked my mother's earrings off her ears and my sister's crucifix off her neck, letting them take only one suitcase.

They said the items belongs to "la revolution," or "the people" and what they meant by "the people" was the Stalinist functionaries' family. My father drilled holes in (the) soles of his shoes and hid his wedding rings.

But at the last stage before the flight, when were leaving from the airport, security forces came and grabbed my father and said he's not going anywhere. Just before they dragged him through the door, my mom said we aren't leaving. My dad told her she had to leave, and we figured he was going to the firing squads. He told my mom "Whatever happens to me, I don't want my children growing up in communist country." We were just ages 8, 5 and 7 years old but we knew something was wrong.
IBD: Why did your dad want to flee?
Fontova: My dad doesn't like to take orders. There's this myth that anyone leaving Fidel Castro's revolution had to be a millionaire, a gangster or a crook. All he wanted was to not be a slave.

We got to Miami, and my mom called Havana. She learns my father is in G2 security headquarters where people were taken for questioning. A lot of people didn't emerge from that questioning and you can imagine my mom's terror, in a strange country, not a penny to her name, three kids and probably a widow. My family moved to New Orleans to stay with relatives.
New Orleans had a fair number of Cubans, and we lived in a small apartment. A few months went by and my mom picks up the receiver again. This time, her reaction was markedly different, this was a screech of joy. My father was calling from the airport, and I remember my dad emerging from the door of the plane and she was running and that embrace I'll never forget. Our story had a happy ending.

What I am trying to do is remind and inform people that thousands of Cuban families did not have a happy ending.
IBD: You mention that the regime imprisoned people. What kinds of figures are you talking about?
Fontova: Cuba in 1961 had 6.3 million people. According to Freedom House, 500,000 Cubans have passed through Cuba's prison systems, proportionately more than went through Stalin's Gulag. At one time in 1961, 350,000 Cubans (were) jailed for political crimes and 1 out of 18 Cubans was a political prisoner. These were people who were overheard talking badly against regime. It's very difficult for people to visualize what a totalitarian regime is — after all, doesn't Latin America always have dictatorship?. Yeah, but Latin America does not have totalitarian Stalinist dictatorships, except in Cuba.

IBD: How did Che create this?
Fontova: It wasn't two weeks after Castro entered Havana that Soviet agents entered. Che was the main conduit with Soviet intelligence agencies.
The Cuban regime executed more people proportionately in its first three years in power than Hitler did in six. Think about that execution rate and then think about that slogan associated with Che — "resist oppression." The ironies are so rich, comparing what Cuban-Americans read and what they experienced.

IBD: Guevara bragged from the podium of the United Nations that "we do executions."
Fontova: And he said "we will continue to do executions" in 1964. According to the Black Book of Communism, published in Paris, 14,000 men and boys were executed in Cuba by that stage, that would be the equivalent of 3 million executions in the U.S., and yet that man who carried them out was hailed by Jesse Jackson, who wrote a book condemning capital punishment.

IBD: Speaking of communist chic, Cameron Diaz got into trouble for toting a Mao bag in Peru, where people knew Maoist terror.
Fontova: But you will notice that Cameron Diaz apologized, so I attribute 80% of the Che paraphernalia seen on people to ignorance. Especially when I am in a generous mood. I hate to think people are that dumb. With ignorance, it's different, they just don't know. After all, if you were to see Korda's picture of Che from a distance, you might say that's a pretty cool picture because it looks like Jim Morrison of The Doors. They have big notions, especially the young kids who see Che as a hero — that he is a revolutionary, that he fought "The Man." No, sir, I say, he was "The Man" that rebellious people fought against. You got it completely backwards.

IBD: You wrote about how Che loathed rock 'n' rollers, gays, artists, black people, and anybody who was part of the establishment.
Fontova: I do this in (the) book by simply quoting Ernesto "Che" Guevara. There is a misperception that he was a free spirit. He had cold Stalinist personality. He used to sign his early correspondence "Stalin II." He said early on that he saw the solution to all the world's problems behind (the) Iron Curtain. But this was not some hippie dippie Marxist, Guevara said in speech in 1962 that he regarded the very spirit of rebellion as anti-revolutionary. Figure that out, he said individualism must disappear in Cuba. If you tried to do your own thing under his regime you wound up in a prison camp.

IBD: What about his personality?
Fontova: He had an arrogant nature. I interviewed people who visited him and tried to save their sons from firing squad executions without trial. He liked to toy with them. He liked to pick up the phone in front of weeping mothers and bark out, "Execute the Fernandez boy right now!"
He was clinically a sadist. Fidel, you could call a psychopath. Murders didn't affect him one way or another. For him, it was a utilitarian slaughter to consolidate his one-man rule.
Che, from all the people I talked to, relished the slaughter. He had a section of a wall knocked out of his second story office so he could watch his beloved firing squads at work.

IBD: Did he kill minors?
Fontova: Lots of boys that went to the firing squads were 15, 16, 17 years old. They were poor boys who joined the military for benefits, much as is done in this country sometimes. They were the ones who got stuck holding the bag. They were killed for the Stalinist regime to say, "We are running the show now" and "This is what is going to happen to you if you question what we are doing here."

They did not make secret of these executions. They wanted make them public as an example similar to what the Stalin forces did to the Polish officer corps in the Katyn Forest Massacre. One reason was to behead the officer corps of the former Cuban army — because they knew that when the time came for a counterrevolution, they'd be the leaders to defeat. But they also wanted to cow the population.

IBD: Was Che an idealist?
Fontova: The book could have been titled that everything you read about Che is not just wrong but upside down. When Che moved to Havana in 1959, it was to the most luxurious mansion inside Cuba. It had waterfalls, it had what would be considered a plasma TV, it had a yacht harbor, a sauna. Its completely documented.

IBD: Yet Che is considered the brains of Cuban revolution.
Fontova: Ariel Dorfman wrote huge economium for Time magazine naming him among the heroes and icons of the 20th century, alongside Mother Teresa. Parisian intellectual Jean Paul Sartre called him "the most complete human of the 20th century." Che was often called the brains of the revolution, but Castro was pulling strings behind him. Guevara seemed like an intellectual because he consorted with French intellectuals as some Argentines did, but in fact he was Castro's puppet and chief executioner.

IBD: The media missed all this. Will it ever change?
Fontova: The mainstream media monopoly is being broken. Alan Colmes of "Hannity and Colmes" once asked me, "Why are these stories coming out now as opposed to 20 years ago? All of a sudden, you discover all this horrible information on Che."
I said, "No, Alan, people have been talking about this since 1959, but it never made it past the mainstream media filter." That monopoly is over, so our side can tell its story to middle America. I like to think this book is an example of that.

Apr 10, 2008

Mass Deportations Coming for Jailed Illegal Immigrants

Not so fast. President Bush is still not serious about border enforcement and deportation of the illegal aliens already here.

The real reason deportation is taking place? BECAUSE AN ELECTION IS COMING, and the Republican party "leadership" knows that illegal immigration is a huge issue for the rock-rib conservative. They don't respect you, which is why they are pandering to you with this token round-up of illegal immigrants. Mark my words - this will not last. As soon as the election is over, the status quo will return to normal.

Let's use our heads for a second, shall we? Does it make sense that, whenever there is a recall of bad beef, the USDA is able to pinpoint exactly which cow in the right ranch was infected, what the cow ate, how old it was, and other vital stats? And the same government empty suits are telling you and me that we can't find 30 million illegal aliens? I'll tell you - they don't want to solve the problem. They can - if they wanted.

So, read the article below, and leave a comment to tell me what you think
-Aaron

---

The U.S. Homeland Security department has launched an ambitious nationwide effort that would cost $2 billion to $3 billion a year to identify and deport the estimated 300,000 to 450,000 illegal immigrants locked up each year in jails and prisons.

The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement operation was denounced by immigrant rights groups and received cautiously by those favoring tighter enforcement.

''We can do something few law enforcement agencies can do: Not only ensure criminals are off the streets, but ensure they are removed from the country," said ICE spokesman Tim Counts. ''Removing hundreds of thousands of criminals from the country is sure to have a positive impact on community safety."

ICE has a presence in only 10 percent of the nation's 3,100 local lockups. Last year, it filed deportation charges against 164,000 illegal immigrants in jail, and removed 95,000, Counts said.

''It's a broad-stroke outline for a plan to locate more of the illegal aliens located in jails and prisons throughout the country," Counts said.

The recently announced ICE effort, known as "Secure Communities," will upgrade computer technology in jails and allow local jailers to access ICE's fingerprint database to quickly identify prisoners with immigration violations as they are booked. The $200 million in funding already allocated for the program this year would also add an unspecified number of ICE detention and removal officers, Counts confirmed.

The program would also:

• Prioritize removal of criminal immigrants based on their danger to the community.

• Expand an early parole program for non-violent immigrants who agree to deportation.

• Add staff in field offices so ICE detention officers are available around-the-clock to assist local jailers in deportation.

• Increase the 287 (g) program, which trains state and local law enforcement officers to perform immigration duties.

Counts said the first priority would be removing "level one" immigrants, those convicted of major drug offenses and violent crimes including murder, manslaughter, rape and armed robbery. Removing those offenders would cost around $1 billion a year. ICE estimates the cost to remove all convicted criminal immigrants in custody would be $2 billion to $3 billion annually.

"We estimate it will take approximately three and a half years to remove all level one criminal aliens, and to test the program's effectiveness," Counts said.

Sheriff's office interested

Harris County sheriff's officials, who are awaiting approval for ICE training for a dozen jail deputies, said they would be interested in access to the ICE database.

''I would assume that as the nature of our relationship with ICE expands, it would be made available to us," said Maj. Don McWilliams, commander of the department's public services bureau. ''As we get our people trained to assist ICE, we certainly would like access to any and all databases ICE has access to."

The Secure Communities initiative expands ICE's Criminal Alien Program, which focuses on identifying deportable immigrants incarcerated in federal, state and local facilities.

The Harris County Sheriff's Office participates in the program by asking county jail inmates if they are in the country legally. Jail officials then refer illegal immigrants to ICE, which can place detainers on them to prevent their release and subject them to deportation.

The same program ignited protests last year in Irving, the Dallas suburb where ICE agents worked closely with city jailers to deport hundreds of illegal immigrants. Activists there complained Irving police were targeting immigrants in raids.

Fire from both sides

The new multiyear ICE operation has raised questions from groups on both sides of the immigration debate.

Curtis Collier, president of the U.S. Border Watch in Houston, said illegal immigrants should only be deported after completing their sentences.

''Deportation is not punishment. We are adamantly opposed to removing people prior to their serving their sentence, because it's basically early release," Collier said. ''And once they deport them, they'll be right back in this country."

Arnoldo Garcia, program coordinator for the National Network of Immigrant Refugee Rights, said the ICE effort could result in profiling of immigrants.

''They're wasting resources," said Garcia, whose group is based in California. ''And how are they going to verify the rights of those individuals who are jailed?"

Oil for War - by Michael Savage

Savage makes a very interesting point here. If you will remember, it was promised that Iraqi oil from the newly liberated nation would (at least partially) pay for the war cost. As you should, that has not been happening - no money from Iraqi oil revenue has gone to pay for the initial invasion and daily operations by the US military. Having said that, read Savage's analysis below.

---

For years, I have been calling for Iraq to pay us back for the cost of liberating them from the torture chambers of Saddam Hussein. Iraq's sustainable oil production capacity is almost 3 million barrels per day. The earth beneath Iraqi sands holds more than 112 billion barrels of oil – the world's second largest proven reserves – and unexplored regions could yield an additional 100 billion barrels, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Iraq also contains 110 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. And yet this war has nearly bankrupted our treasury.

I was surprised to hear Senator Carl Levin, a Democrat from Michigan, call for this very idea at the Petraeus hearings this week he said, "We need to put continuous and increasing pressure on the Iraqis to settle their political differences, to pay for their own reconstruction with their oil windfalls, and to take the lead in conducting military operations."

It is fascinating to hear a liberal congressman repeat my idea while the so-called "conservatives", the Whig Party of our time, the Republicans continue to pump money from American taxpayers to support this unpopular war instead of pumping Iraqi oil. We have spent 500 billion, half a trillion dollars so far on making the Sunni triangle safe for democracy, but it hasn't even kept our own Marines safe from prosecution. The month that President Bush was sworn into office, gas was $1.40 a gallon. This week, gas is averaging $3.30 a gallon, and near $5 a gallon in Los Angeles. Two dollars a gallon more for the war on terror! Make the Iraqis foot the bill for their own liberation!

When the Republican Party stops depleting the tax base for this endless war, Iraq's oil can be used to rebuild their country and pay us back. Now it is time for the 24 million liberated Iraqis to pay back their liberators. With the one resource they have – oil.

Mar 7, 2008

Posts on Victory Briefs Daily

As I searched Google for my name, I found these gems (you can go to the link to see the names of the guy that posted this)...
By the way, I recommend Michael Savage’s SAVAGE NATION. He covers a variety of topics, all of his positions laughable. A good read.

Also, I’m sure Patrick would like to recognize Aaron Cichon, a student at Strake Jesuit who wrote a very racist case for the pofo topic last year in Mr. Crist’s freshman speech class. It was he who gave us the ideas for the ironic part of the AC.

Some of the cards we used/were considering:

Michael Savage: “Man, this is what we’re fighting for. We’re working to preserve the freedom that enables a family to play and love each other without fear of being harmed. Which is why we must do everything in our power - including racial profiling as needed - to snuff out those who are here, right now, waiting to snuff out the American dream.”

“This will shock you, but it’s a fact: 25 to 30 percent of all prisoners in our jails today are illegal immigrants. You better read that again. Do you understand what that means to your paycheck? Americans are being taxed to fund the cost of housing, feeding, entertaining, and guarding one in the four prisoners who don’t even belong in this country! That’s insanity”

“There’s a third class who come to America. These dirty thieves come here not to mooch, not for the ACLU-care benefits, not to study, not for the host of other liberal handouts. They come to kill us. They come to poison your daughter’s lunch box. They come to fly planes into buildings. These snakes pretend to be one of us. They might blend in as they await their orders to stab America in the back.”

Pat Buchanan: “Who can guarantee that, of the untold millions of illegals here, and the scores of thousands ordered deported for crimes who have disappeared into our midst, none is a terrorist waiting for orders to blow up a subway or mall and massacre American citizens? Most of these illegals come to work to send money back to their families. They are not bad people. But because they are predominantly young and male, they commit a disproportionate share of violent crimes. Why should U.S. citizens be assaulted, robbed, raped and murdered, and have their children molested, because their government will not enforce its own laws? Is this not an indictment of democracy itself? What dictatorial regime would put up with this?” Buchanan also attacks various ethnic groups in the US (”hyphenated Americanism”) — including Jews, Blacks, Hispanics, Greeks, and Armenians — for exerting too much political influence and weakening the foundation of the United States’ traditional Anglo-Saxon culture.

Irony solves.

Here is a reply from an anonymous poster named John:

This is a response to the post by Brian Kwik (#63):

So, everyone who is a conservative is supposed to agree with other conservatives who are in “professional politics” (meaning that they are nationally recognized)? Not everyone in America is a “Bush-bot” like Rush Limbaugh or Sean Hannity. Here is what Buchanan has posted on his website, theamericancause.org:

“Since he [President Bush] took office in 2001, Bush said in Tucson, Ariz., U.S. border agents have apprehended and sent home 4.5 million illegal aliens, ‘including more than 350,000 with criminal records.’”

What is so ironic about the Michael Savage and Pat Buchanan quotes? They have the same positions on abortion, affirmative action, foreign aid, gun rights, immigration, and taxes - all of the biggest issues that really matter.

One last thing: any sensible human being should know that ALL of the positions described in Michael Savage’s book THE SAVAGE NATION are not laughable, as you say, Brian Kwik. Certainly, if you disagree with Savage about something, you may find it funny that he says it. But the pro-life stance he takes is “laughable?” How about anti-terrorism - is that funny, too? What about his standing up for the tradionial family: were you rolling on the floor, trying to keep your sides splitting from the humor?

If they are, then I would like to know what turkey baster you were born in. Your opinions were most likely taken from your parents - as they raised you, correct? or am I incorrect in that assumption, too? - and no child could possibly withstand the tools an abortionist uses to rip an unwanted child to pieces.

So now, this is where the mental disorder of liberalism comes to expose its ugly head; the response to the anonymous post:

I’m gonna respond to this cause it’s funny.

“What is so ironic about the Michael Savage and Pat Buchanan quotes? They have the same positions on abortion, affirmative action, foreign aid, gun rights, immigration, and taxes - all of the biggest issues that really matter.”

Yeah, and their positions are laughable.

“One last thing: any sensible human being should know that ALL of the positions described in Michael Savage’s book THE SAVAGE NATION are not laughable, as you say, Brian Kwik. ”

They are if you’re educated.

“But the pro-life stance he takes is “laughable?””

Yeah, it’s laughable. It’s also archaic, but laughable is part of it.

“How about anti-terrorism - is that funny, too? ”

To essentialize it like that? Yeah, it’s funny. Us against the terrorists, right? Yes, the position is absolutely laughable.

” What about his standing up for the tradionial family: were you rolling on the floor, trying to keep your sides splitting from the humor?”

Yup. Between getting irritated by the reactionary homophobia that is vital to the “traditional family” position. It would be hilarious if it weren’t so offensive and stupid.

” and no child could possibly withstand the tools an abortionist uses to rip an unwanted child to pieces.”

Fallacy. Appeal to emotion. In all honesty, if someone doesn’t want their baby, they should probably have it aborted. Not three weeks before it’s due, but within a reasonable time frame.

And yeah, your positions are pretty laughable, too.

That's the cost of being a conservative in modern America. Ain't that sweet.

-Aaron

Feb 7, 2008

John McCain - A Fraud

As you now know, John McCain is the leading Republican candidate so far for the 2008 Presidential election. All the other major-leaguers have bowed out because they couldn't win, or because they just ran out of money (Fred Thompson, Rudy, and today, Mitt Romney).

This leaves us with three very exciting possibilities...
  • a Congressman from Brazoria county who says mall security does a better at securing America than the Marines (Dr. Ron Paul, OB/GYN)
  • a Joel Olsteen-like preacher who thinks he's funny, but really not (Mike Huck-a-schmuck)
  • and the "Clinton of the Right," John McCain the war hero.
You will hear a lot about McCain's war record. That is because he wants to remove the focus from his terrible domestic policy record, and focus us on just his heroism from many years ago.

Let me tell you though, McCain's heroism in Vietnam was much more real than John Kerry's ever was.

But McCain's record is one of secrets and deceit - a record of fraudulent and adulterous Republicanism.

Here is his trail of tears:
  • Gang of 14
    • He stopped conservatives in Congress from preventing unconstitutional Democrat filibusters of true conservative Supreme Court nominees. All SC nominees deserve an up-or-down (yes-or-no) vote, but McCain the Liberal led the fight on the other side of the aisle - with the Democrats.
  • McCain/Feingold
    • This is campaign finance reform, which allows only the rich to run for President and other high office. This leads to the destruction of our First Amendment, as this completely prevents the "little people" from purchasing ad time on television (the easiest way to reach lots of people at the same time) to inform others about candidates.
  • Drilling in ANWR
    • McCain compares ANWAR to the Everglades and the Grand Canyon.
  • John Kerry's Vice-President
  • McCain/Kennedy amnesty
    • Do you like illegal immigration? John McCain does! McCain wrote amnesty legislation in the summer of 2007 with Ted Kennedy to grant amnesty for 12-30 million illegal immigrants in America. If we disagreed, we were racists or bigots.
  • Rights for terrorists
    • "Supports giving lawyers and American rights to foreign terrorists, bringing them to our homeland, then setting them free to roam about with zero interrogation. No understanding of the War on Terror, this being his evidence of it."
  • Lies
    • "Frequently lies about his record including smearing Romney for something he didn't say, ie. "timetables". An action condemned by nearly every conservative and media op in the country."
  • Anti-Tax Cuts
    • "Voted against the Bush Tax Cuts before he voted to make them permanent. The latter being only so he could attempt to run for President as a 'Republican'."
  • Anti-Capitalism
    • "Constantly speaking out against big business including all the jobs Romney created in the private sector. All for the sake of a cheap shot in a debate on TV."
  • Anti-Conservative judges
    • "Mentioned specifically that he would not have nominated Sam Alito to the SCOTUS. Unforgivable."
The structure of this post was borrowed from a post by "Cary" on PatGray.com
http://www.patgray.com/content/view/1143/21/

Now, the most attentive reader will recognize that I did not mention McCain on pro-life issues. He is abysmal on that as well. This is from Ann Coulter's most recent column:

"Although McCain has the minimum pro-life record demanded by the voters of Arizona, in 2006, McCain voted in favor of using taxpayer funds to harvest stem cells from human embryos. He opposes a constitutional amendment to protect human life. And he frets that if Roe v. Wade were overruled, women's lives would be "endangered." This is the same John McCain who chides Mitt Romney today for "flip-flopping" on abortion. At least Romney flips and stays there.

Of course the most important issue for pro-lifers is the Supreme Court. As long as Roe v. Wade is the law of the land, it doesn't matter how many hearts and minds we've changed. So it's not insignificant that McCain has called Justice Samuel Alito too conservative."


Now can you finally understand the conservative outrage amongst the party faithful? McCain talks a good game of "uniting the party," but he is the one DIVIDING us. It's him and his liberal foolishness that will cause us to loose the next election - lest we find a true conservative in the next nine months.

-Aaron

(sickening, by the way)



Nov 15, 2007

Proton May Develop "Islamic Car"

UALA LUMPUR, Malaysia — So what constitutes an "Islamic car"? A vehicle with a compartment to store a Qu'ran and prayer scarf, as well as a built-in compass that points the way to Mecca.

Described as an Iranian initiative, the concept is under consideration by Malaysia's state-owned Proton, which just won an order to supply Tehran's taxi fleet with 5,000 Waja compacts.

A Proton executive, in Iran to secure the deal, described his company's dream of an "Islamic car" that could be produced in Malaysia, Iran or Turkey and sold in various global markets, including countries with large Muslim populations such as Indonesia and Pakistan. Such a car, he added, "will have all the Islamic features," including the aforementioned way-to-Mecca compass and storage for the Muslim holy book.

What this means to you: Niche marketing and culturally sensitive marketing join together in this unusual display.

From Edmunds.com